- The function class
- #tagcoding for #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS)
- Evaluating and improving #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS)
- Guide to Constitution Building
- Searching Constitutions
COFOG description of #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS) (function of government class) (Ens Dictionary).
#tagcoding hashtag: #cofog0111 |
#cofog0111 is the #tagcoding hashtag for #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS). Use it when tagcoding or searching content about this function of government.
For the function of government in a specific country, add the country's ISO code to #cofog0111, for instance #cofog0111DZ1 for a post or tweet about #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS) in Algeria.
For quite a number of functions of government, the recently agreed Sustainable Development Goals and Targets provide measurable targets.
To know what initiatives have been undertaken, or are being undertaken, the DAC 5 and CRS Purpose Codes (OECD DAC) can be used to consult the OECD DCD-DAC Development finance statistics or the IATI Datastore.
Administration, operation or support of executive and legislative organs.
Includes: office of the chief executive at all levels of government - office of the monarch, governor-general, president, prime minister, governor, mayor, etc.; legislative bodies at all levels of government - parliaments, chambers of deputies, senates, assemblies, town councils, etc.; advisory, administrative and political staffs attached to chief executive offices and legislatures; libraries and other reference services serving mainly executive and legislative organs; physical amenities provided to the chief executive, the legislature and their aides; permanent or ad hoc commissions and committees created by or acting on behalf of the chief executive or legislature.
Excludes: ministerial offices, offices of heads of departments of local governments, interdepartmental committees, etc. concerned with a specific function (classified according to function).
For each function of government a substantial number of online resources are available. Some of these resources are listed here. Additions can be suggested in comments, or posts using #cofog0111.
- Collaborative planning for #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS)
- Value orientations
- Gaps and diagnostics
- Guidelines
- Notes
A Collaborative Planning Methodology is (simple) repeatable process that can be used to improve the quality of a function of government.
Check the tabs for some possible questions and a format for documenting the collaborative planning for an improved function of government resulting from Awareness, capacity & care for #LocalizingSDGs.
For persons:
Objective:
Options
For organizations:
Objectives
for political party: accept competition with other political parties for the membership of the legislature.
for executive offices:
for legislature:
Options
for political party:
for executive offices:
for legislature:
In a territory:
What are feasible objectives & options for delivering this function of government? Taking into consideration dependencies on the country's resource endowments, what options exist to achieve which objectives for this function of government?
Objective: run the executive offices and the legislative organs with a Regime 2 maturity (see tab Diagnostics for the definition of this regime).
Objective: Achieving and sustaining unity in the country.
Options:
- Creating a common vision prior to launching institutional reform.
- Early on, rule-of-law reform must promote greater transparency and accountability in public administration agencies that handle things like vehicle registration, building permits, rubbish removal, public health inspection, banking regulations and tax collection, since more people have contact with these agencies (and their history of discriminatory practices and corruption) than they do with the formal judiciary.
- Constitutions are most durable and stable when they are made through broad consultation and negotiation to ensure that all socio-politico-economic forces of the country agree on the rules of the game and put the interests of the people at the center of everything.
- Harmonizing traditional and modern institutions
What goes wrong and why?
Gaps can be articulated with respect to a result framework or the Sustainable development goals (#SDGs). One must take into consideration the level of scope, and its level of development (in a peer group).
In the diagnostics we must also clarify cause-effect relationships in a diagnostic hypothesis.
A wide range of political regimes (types of political systems) exist. Encyclopedia Brittanica highlights the distinction between unitary nation-states and federal systems, the mode of succession (hereditary, by constitional prescription, by election, by force), autocratic versus non-autocratic systems a.o. (Typologies of government).
In the Actor Atlas two regimes are prominent:
- the absence of substantive democracy, or appropriate governance and public administration institutions that promote peace, development and the protection of human rights (Regime 1); and
- the substantive democracy of interdependent democratic institutions with ‘democratic politics and active citizenship,’ which describes the desired executive and legislative organs, behaviours and attitudes; governance institutions that promote the collaboration and participation of all stakeholders from all sectors (the public sector, private sector, and civil society) (Regime 2).
It is assumed that stakeholders of Regime 1 institutions aim towards Regime 2 institutions because of their higher quality. The UNPAN report Reconstructing Public Administration after Conflict: Challenges, Practices and Lessons Learned (2010) will serve as a source for role-specific guidance to Regime 1 stakeholders.
What guidelines can be formulated for delivering this function of government?
The guidelines for actors at the various level of scope had better be informed by a Theory of Change that is aligned with a strong diagnostic hypothesis for the function of government.
Pico: Citizens, Party leader, Prime Minister, Member of Parliament,
Micro: political party
Meso: Inter-Parliamentary Union, League of Cities, League of Municipalities, League of Provinces, United Nations Peacebuilding Commission
Macro: Executive, Parliament (Legislature), Judiciary, Parliamentary Monitoring Organization
- Public private partnerships which may involve cooperatives2 may offer suitable models for delivering certain functions of government! What are (open access) best practices? What are workable public-private boundaries in delivering this function?
- The level of scope in guidelines is reflected in the socio-technical level of roles. Each role must be defined in one of Pico roles, Micro roles, Meso roles or Macro roles. When a role is referenced here, its definition page should also contain a link to this page.
- Comments
- Other classes of #COFOG01 - General Public Services
- Other COFOG divisions
- #tagcoding steb-by-step
#COFOG01 - General Public Services
- #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS)
- #cofog0112 - Financial and fiscal affairs (CS)
- #cofog0113 - External affairs (CS)
- #cofog0121 - Economic aid to developing countries and countries in transition (CS)
- #cofog0122 - Economic aid routed through international organizations (CS)
- #cofog0131 - General personnel services (CS)
- #cofog0132 - Overall planning and statistical services (CS)
- #cofog0133 - Other general services (CS)
- #cofog0140 - Basic research (CS)
- #cofog0150 - R&D General public services (CS)
- #cofog0160 - General public services n.e.c. (CS)
- #cofog0170 - Public debt transactions (CS)
- #cofog0180 - Transfers of a general character between different levels of government (CS)
- #COFOG01 - General Public Services
- #COFOG02 - Defence
- #COFOG03 - Public Order and Safety
- #COFOG04 - Economic Affairs
- #COFOG05 - Environmental Protection
- #COFOG06 - Housing and Community Amenities
- #COFOG07 - Health
- #COFOG08 - Recreation, Culture and Religion
- #COFOG09 - Education
- #COFOG10 - Social Protection
Other functions of government via Tag cloud for functions of government (term cloud).
Sharing or searching
Do you have a question about #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS) in your country?
Do you have or know content to share about #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS) in a specific country?
Do you have an answer to a tagged question?
Then tweet or post the question, content or answer, with the hashtag constructed by adding the country's ISO code to #cofog0111, for instance #cofog0111DZ3 for a post or tweet about #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS) in Algeria.
Global Conversation
Look up #cofog0111 for recent online news and announcements on #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS).
No #cofog0111 content yet?
- Start the conversation by posting and sharing and re-sharing content, questions and answers about #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS), adding its hashtag #cofog0111 .
- Is content specific to a country? Then add the country's ISO code as listed per continent in the sidebar or menu.
- Empower your readers by explaining the use of the #tags.
Plenty of #cofog0111 content already?
- Consider curating it, and propose improvements for the initial sections of this page.
- Target guidelines at actors at different levels in the Social Architecture, or in function maps of country social capital wikis.
- Be aware of the Sustainable development goals (#SDGs) that matter for this function of government, and explain what each actor should do to achieve them.
Check the #tagcoding handbook for more details.
A paper by Tanja Aitamurto (Tampere) and Hélène Landemore (Stanford) on an interesting crowdsourcing exercise in Finland: Crowdsourcing Off-Road Traffic Legislation in Finland.
Abstract: This paper reports on a pioneering case study of a legislative process open to the direct online participation of the public. The empirical context of the study is a crowdsourced off-road traffic law in Finland. On the basis of our analysis of the user content generated to date and a series of interviews with key participants, we argue that the process qualifies as a promising case of deliberation on a mass-scale. This case study will make an important contribution to the understanding of online methods for participatory and deliberative democracy. The preliminary findings indicate that there is deliberation in the crowdsourcing process, which occurs organically (to a certain degree) among the participants, despite the lack of incentives for it. Second, the findings strongly indicate that there is a strong educative element in crowdsourced lawmaking process, as the participants share information and learn from each other. The peer-learning aspect could be made even stronger through the addition of design elements in the process and on the crowdsourcing software.
Jan Goossenaerts
@collaboratewiki
The question.
The founder's answer:
Regulatory Breakdown - The Crisis of Confidence in U.S. Regulation, edited by Cary Coglianese, gives a profound analysis of the problems in the current regulatory system, its coverage in the media, and the impact of all this for a nation (risks, persistent partisan division on issues, …).
In Law 2.0, one would expect that these problems are solved.
In a comment on The Rule of More (The Economists, February 20, 2012) I refer to some techniques to contain the cost of regulatory change. One would expect such techniques to be applied as well. This could be done in a methodological approach which I call the Collective Regulative Bundle. This approach introduces in the social and law domain the notion of diagnostics-therapeutics chain, a notion which is common in the health profession.
Further reading:
This comment is also relevant to ISIC 6910 - Legal activities.
Jan Goossenaerts
@collaboratewiki