Guidance on content patterns and key concepts: Global Partnership — scope — societal architecture — actor maps — statute books — initiative books — resource books — three realm maps — government functions — industry sectors — municipal circles
Development is inherently connected to changes in the interactions among social actors, as well as changes in actor access to resources.
In development strategies and initiatives one often makes assumptions on actors and the (possible) claims these actors have on resources. Baseline descriptions of the current situation, the prevailing statutes, and of the change initiatives to which actors have committed, are frequently made.
As many actors participate, or have stakes, in concurrent and successive initiatives, much will be written about each actor, yet no initiative will provide and maintain a comprehensive and up-to-date description of the status quo, and there will be no consensus description. Facts and views about the current situation, statutes and the (expected) impact of statutes and initiatives are usually presented with a filter that is biased by opinion:
- to inflate or promote the own share in the arena;
- to underscore the opinion that government has too many powers, the claims of government agencies will be presented as if no checks and balances exist and as if officials act in a role of principal rather than in a role of agent;
- in weak democracies, the having of private ends in the public service easily coexists with the perception of unchecked and broad powers of government, a narrow discourse of lean government and deregulation, and poor attention being given to the division of powers that comes with democratic institutions and social contracts.
Mutual Accountability in Democratic Arenas with Clear Claims and Mandates
Because of its socio-systemic complexity and the multiple disciplines, events and shocks that have contributed to its emergence over several millennia, the democratic arena has become more complex than most people can cope with in their imagination. And few will have the luck of being able to experience its workings in more than only a few facets. Judges and some politicians, especially the senior ones, are privileged in this sense: for them the democratic arena has become a small world. Yet for 99,99% of the population of any country in the world, the democratic arena is a big world1. Claims and mandates are poorly understood and they are prone to mis-representation in the discourse. Such conditions feed alienation of the constituencies from their Executive and Legislature, as we increasingly witness, even in modern democracies.
It is for the 99,99% of the population for whom the democratic arena is a big world that this actor atlas is intended.
Making a Big World Small, wiki page by wiki page
By sharing actor maps, statute books, initiative books, sector maps and government function maps, stakeholders can express and refine facts, ideas, conflicts, agreements and dependencies, such that a fair shared image of reality as a sociotope becomes possible, and feasible change options can be explored in a more inclusive and converging manner. This in its turn will bring substantial benefits to development initiatives undertaken by multiple stakeholders2.
The functions of actors, the relationships among the actors, claims on resources, and references to mandates and powers, all are governed by prevailing statutes (social contracts) or customary law. This is briefly explained at Access, Claims and Contracts (Ens Dictionary).
.. yet engaging people's talents via #tags
Several years of (part-time) advocacy for the mission of Making a Big World Small wiki page by wiki page, had not yielded the desired uptake.
The #tags defined on the #GlobalPartnership #tag pivot help us to make specific wiki pages part of the discourse via social media (via Twitter, Google+, Facebook, …) , and they support every willing individual to follow and contribute to any discussion thread whenever she or he has time or urge.
About 160 000 development discussion threads are supported if we only count those per country, that is 800 "sustainable development" topics per country. But it is a straightforward exercise to define unique tags per state, province, city or municipality for the same topics.
That is the topic space via which the people's talents can be invited and nurtured, and via which mutual accountability "checks" can potentially involve all.
The Actor Atlas targets to become a societal architecture repository3. The Actor Atlas contains:
- Sustainable Development Goals and Targets: a page for each sustainable development goal and target proposed by the OWG in July 2014, and approved by the UN General Assembly of September 2015;
- initiative books listing #tags for SDGs in each country, for the economic activities and the functions of government. The page also lists some of the development initiatives relevant for the country;
- actor maps listing social actors at different socio-technical levels (macro, meso, micro and pico);
- statute books listing the statutes that express the institutionalized relationships among the actors;
- government function maps, with a page for each function of government defined in the COFOG classification;
- industry sector maps with a page for each economic activity defined in the ISIC classification;
- Social actors role descriptions for selected macro, meso, micro and pico actors;
- Global engagement for local development: a more detailed description of the approach for local engagement and knowledge conversion that is supported by the Actor Atlas and the aligned social capital wikis.
In the social architecture actors are classifed at levels macro, meso, micro and pico in accordance with their functions and claims. The classification is clarified, justified and illustrated in below pages:
In this atlas, the grouping of actors, primarily macro- and meso-level actors, is determined by their "socio-technical" level and their geographic territory.
Most of the statutes, initiatives and resources are to be nurtured by macro and meso-level actors. The concerns of companies and citizens are typically represented by an interest or pressure group, which is a meso-level actor. Likewise, we consider the group of all rice farmers in a territory a meso-level actor. Yet the individual farmer is a pico-level actor. Also for micro-level actors the same rule applies: each bank operating in a country is a micro-level actor, yet the group of all banks, e.g., typically represented by a federation of banks, is a meso-level actor.
Claims, Contracts and Agreements
Each actor will make a number of claims, such as the executive claiming sovereign rule over a territory. Each actor may enter into contracts or agreements with other actors, for instance to allow passage to citizens of a neigbouring country. Further details at Access, Claims and Contracts.
The proliferation of claims and contracts may lead to a certain annoyance for the ruled persons. This is briefly explained in Scope of Claims.
The agreements information included in this (prototype) atlas is of two kinds:
Considerable attention goes to statutes that are enacted within a country, a sector or a discipline, and treaties between countries. For ease of reference and structuring, treaties, conventions and charters are also included in a statute book.
How treaties and statutes matter to development is illustrated by the EU's Generalised System of Preferences4. This is a trade arrangement through which the EU provides preferential access to the EU market to 176 developing countries and territories, in the form of reduced tariffs for their goods when entering the EU market. It is implemented by a Council Regulation applicable for a period of three years at a time.
This atlas is offered as a prototype, to demonstrate a service concept in support of an effective sustainable development strategy.
As the actor atlas service will be adopted by a growing user community, it will be important to enact formal maintenance procedures and comply to certain principles as explained at Global Agreement - Maintenance Procedures.
The actor atlas, in its current version, does not aim to be complete regarding the identification and presentation of actors, their statutes, resources and initiatives, and the maps of sectors and functions of government.