government?
The function of government class
The COFOG description of this class is at #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS) (function of government class) (Ens wiki).
#tagcoding for #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS)
#cofog0111 is the #tagcoding hashtag for #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS). Use it when tagcoding or searching content about this function of government.
For the function of government in a specific country, add the country's ISO code to #cofog0111, for instance #cofog0111DZ1 for a post or tweet about #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS) in Algeria.
Evaluating and improving #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS)
For quite a number of functions of government, the recently agreed Sustainable Development Goals and Targets provide measurable targets.
To know what initiatives have been undertaken, or are being undertaken, the DAC 5 and CRS Purpose Codes (OECD DAC) can be used to consult the OECD DCD-DAC Development finance statistics or the IATI Datastore.
Administration, operation or support of executive and legislative organs.
Includes: office of the chief executive at all levels of government - office of the monarch, governor-general, president, prime minister, governor, mayor, etc.; legislative bodies at all levels of government - parliaments, chambers of deputies, senates, assemblies, town councils, etc.; advisory, administrative and political staffs attached to chief executive offices and legislatures; libraries and other reference services serving mainly executive and legislative organs; physical amenities provided to the chief executive, the legislature and their aides; permanent or ad hoc commissions and committees created by or acting on behalf of the chief executive or legislature.
Excludes: ministerial offices, offices of heads of departments of local governments, interdepartmental committees, etc. concerned with a specific function (classified according to function).
- Collaborative planning for #cofog0111 - Executive and legislative organs (CS)
- Resources
- Value orientations
- Gaps and diagnostics
- Guidelines
- Notes
A Collaborative Planning Methodology is (simple) repeatable process that can be used to improve the quality of a function of government.
Check the tabs for some possible questions and a format for documenting the collaborative planning for an improved function of government resulting from Awareness, capacity & care for #LocalizingSDGs.
The e-book on Societal Architecture addresses digital enablers and digital common pool resources for the human side of the "big three subjects" in the societal enterprise: Leadership (Humanity), Decision Making and Communication.
- Comments
- Other classes of #COFOG01 - General Public Services
- Other COFOG divisions
- #tagcoding steb-by-step
A paper by Tanja Aitamurto (Tampere) and Hélène Landemore (Stanford) on an interesting crowdsourcing exercise in Finland: Crowdsourcing Off-Road Traffic Legislation in Finland.
Abstract: This paper reports on a pioneering case study of a legislative process open to the direct online participation of the public. The empirical context of the study is a crowdsourced off-road traffic law in Finland. On the basis of our analysis of the user content generated to date and a series of interviews with key participants, we argue that the process qualifies as a promising case of deliberation on a mass-scale. This case study will make an important contribution to the understanding of online methods for participatory and deliberative democracy. The preliminary findings indicate that there is deliberation in the crowdsourcing process, which occurs organically (to a certain degree) among the participants, despite the lack of incentives for it. Second, the findings strongly indicate that there is a strong educative element in crowdsourced lawmaking process, as the participants share information and learn from each other. The peer-learning aspect could be made even stronger through the addition of design elements in the process and on the crowdsourcing software.
Jan Goossenaerts
@collaboratewiki
The question.
The founder's answer:
Regulatory Breakdown - The Crisis of Confidence in U.S. Regulation, edited by Cary Coglianese, gives a profound analysis of the problems in the current regulatory system, its coverage in the media, and the impact of all this for a nation (risks, persistent partisan division on issues, …).
In Law 2.0, one would expect that these problems are solved.
In a comment on The Rule of More (The Economists, February 20, 2012) I refer to some techniques to contain the cost of regulatory change. One would expect such techniques to be applied as well. This could be done in a methodological approach which I call the Collective Regulative Bundle. This approach introduces in the social and law domain the notion of diagnostics-therapeutics chain, a notion which is common in the health profession.
Further reading:
This comment is also relevant to ISIC 6910 - Legal activities.
Jan Goossenaerts
@collaboratewiki